Sunday, May 29, 2011

Battle: Los Angeles

Battle: Los Angeles (2011)

A Marine Staff Sergeant who has just had his retirement approved goes back into the line of duty in order to assist a 2nd Lieutenant and his platoon as they fight to reclaim the city of Los Angeles from alien invaders.



"Shit, I'd rather be in Afghanistan"

Aliens have invaded and it's up to a small group of Marines to hold ground in LA. They must rescue civilians and get the hell out of dodge before the city gets bombed.



Not a whole hell of a lot of plot in this one, but what else can you expect from an alien invasion movie. Battle: Los Angeles is a mix of Black Hawk Down and Independence Day, two films that are better than this one. You would think combining the two would lead to an sure fire winner. The film is loud and in your face, I mildly enjoyed it, but thought the overall experience was pretty lacking. 




The camera is more jolting here than in most hand-held camera movies like Cloverfield or Quarantine. I honestly thought the cameraman dropped the camera and picked it back up in one scene and they decided to keep it in to hide the fact that they didn't know what they were doing. I went into this film not expecting greatness, I simply wanted to be entertained. The film somewhat accomplishes this, for a few short moments, but near the end I found myself watching the same scenes play out over and over again. They get stuck in some location, have to shoot their way out, repeat. This is a very redundant film. 




I love some of the effects, the initial attack and carnage is great. The spaceships are mechanical so nothing too awe inspiring there. The aliens themselves are what really disappointed me. We never get a clear image of them and when we get something close enough, we see how uninspiring they are. The film is a war movie dressed up like a sci/fi, it should have been the other way around. It felt like an ad for the Marines.




The acting is as expected, nothing to talk about. People simply yell things at each other because they are in the heat of combat. Two civilians show up, Bridget Moynahan and Michael Peña, to make us feel like we are caught in the cross fire as well, since we are not marines wielding weapons. Speaking of the marines, I did not know who was who and I didn't give a damn. They all could have died and I probably wouldn't have noticed. 




Battle: Los Angeles biggest defeat is how generic and blah it turned out to be. There was no awe moment, which I was waiting for. No kick ass moment or even a scene that stood out above the rest. The whole movie went through the war movie clichés and didn't even seem to try to make a mark in the sci/fi genre. Will we be talking about this movie in the next few years? Nope, I doubt we will be talking about it in the next few months. That's the problem, it's a forgettable action, sci/fi flick.

6/10


Have you seen it? If so, what's your opinion?


28 comments:

  1. for some reason the movie poster reminded me of the cover of bad company 2

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yeah ive seen this and 6/10 is quite a fair assessment. I enjoyed this movie.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I've not seen it but I think I'll give it a watch when I get some free time. Followed for more reviews :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. i haven't seem it yet but it seems like a good film to watch on a sunday. thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  5. nice review but the film is not so good!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Id say 6/10 is a good score for this movie. It was slow, predictable, and a little cheesy. Long awkward silences followed by short, loud confrontations. Although, I have man-love for Aaron Eckart, I don't think he fits the part of a marine. A lawyer, perhaps.. but not a marine.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Seen it in the cinema.
    For me an averagely action movie, not that bad but also not the best movie I've seen.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I've never seen this, but it has to be better than Skyline

    ReplyDelete
  9. I hate how they acted like this was based on a true story.

    ReplyDelete
  10. this movie was a lot better than you gave it credit for IMO... especially when compared to some of the recent movies of the same genre like SKYLINE! which was absolute trash xD

    ReplyDelete
  11. I was lured by the trailed which really made the movie look awesome, but after seeing it I guess I was pretty disappointed :/

    ReplyDelete
  12. At least the visual effects must be great!

    ReplyDelete
  13. I have seen it and it was ok, considering that I haven't seen any marketing related things up until I actually took the jump an watched it.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Good review. I have wanted to see this for a while.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Does look promising, although not too sure on the whole idea of it... still looks like a visually awesome film!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Not a fan of war movies, but Full Metal Jacket is pretty sick!

    ReplyDelete
  17. I actually liked it. One of the deaths moved me a bit (don't wanna spoil). My biggest regret is that I didn't see it in the moving seats my theater offers.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Figures, i was going to see it but didnt make time for it and now i know why. IT SUCKS.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I think it is funny how you summarized it, because that was the feeling I was getting from the review. Just another bland cliche, but not the worst movie you have ever seen.

    ReplyDelete
  20. have not seen it, think i'll skip this one

    ReplyDelete
  21. Looks like just a time waster.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I havent seen this movie but i want to

    ReplyDelete